Re: Improvement of procArray.xmin for VACUUM
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Improvement of procArray.xmin for VACUUM |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9788.1174960775@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Improvement of procArray.xmin for VACUUM (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Improvement of procArray.xmin for VACUUM
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > Gregory Stark wrote: >> I have a question about what would happen for a transaction running a command >> like COPY FROM. Is it possible it would manage to arrange to have no live >> snapshots at all? So it would have no impact on concurrent VACUUMs? What about >> something running a large pg_restore? > Interesting idea. Indeed. Currently, COPY forcibly sets a snapshot on the off chance something will use it, but I could certainly see making that happen "lazily", ie not at all in the simple case. pg_restore is probably a lost cause, at least if you are running it in single-transaction mode. I guess there'd be tradeoffs as to whether to do that or not ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: