Re: PL/pgSQL RENAME functionality in TODOs
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL/pgSQL RENAME functionality in TODOs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 97724FF0-5ED3-4F23-AAF7-2F151B0E29A1@decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PL/pgSQL RENAME functionality in TODOs ("Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@hotmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PL/pgSQL RENAME functionality in TODOs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Feb 1, 2007, at 5:08 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > std. use rename only for triggers and variables new and old. It has > sense. I don't see sense for rename in clasic plpgsql functions. > There was one reason, rename unnamed $params. But currently plpgsql > support named params and this reason is obsolete. Unless things have changed it can be a real PITA to deal with plpgsql variables that share the same name as a field in a table. IIRC there's some cases where it's not even possible to unambiguously refer to the plpgsql variable instead of the field. For internal variables there's a decent work-around... just prefix all variables with something like v_. But that's pretty ugly for parameters... get_user(user_id int) is certainly a nicer interface than get_user(p_user_id int). But I think a way to get around that would be to RENAME the arguments in the DECLARE section, so user_id could become p_user_id under the covers. So perhaps there is still a point to RENAME after-all, at least for paramaters. -- Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: