Re: AW: Problems with RULE
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AW: Problems with RULE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9754.983983435@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | AW: Problems with RULE ("Jens Hartwig" <jens.hartwig@t-systems.de>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
"Jens Hartwig" <jens.hartwig@t-systems.de> writes: > What would have happened, if I executed an unconditional DELETE? > => DELETE FROM t_xyz; > Which statement would have been generated by PostgreSQL in this case? Unfortunately, I didn't keep the prior discussion, so I don't remember exactly what the rule was. But the general idea for conditional rules is that we generate rule-action WHERE rule-action's-own-conditions AND rule-condition AND conditions-from-original-query (repeat for each action of each relevant rule) and then if we didn't find any relevant unconditional INSTEAD rules, we generate original-query-action WHERE conditions-from-original-query AND NOT (conditions-of-conditional-INSTEAD-rules) There's a more extensive discussion in the Programmer's Guide, http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/rules.html regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: