David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> writes:
> On 7/15/19 11:07 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>>> The only thoughts I have so far here are that it's a shame that the
>>> function got called list_qsort() and not just list_sort().
> I agree with David -- list_sort() is better. I don't think "sort" is
> such a common stem that searching is a big issue, especially with modern
> code indexing tools.
OK, I'm outvoted, will do it that way.
regards, tom lane