Re: Sponsoring enterprise features
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sponsoring enterprise features |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9720.1069395653@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sponsoring enterprise features (Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: Sponsoring enterprise features
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca> writes: > Personally, I think the best way is simply to make a post on -hackers > with a description of what you want to accomplish with a call for > estimates and proposals. ... > I say a description of what you want to accomplish because certain > features are not as useful on PostgreSQL as they are other databases > (data partitioning being one of them, due to the ability to use partial > indexes) so you may not achieve what you are expecting. Right. You can in any case get a great deal of free advice by starting a pghackers discussion ;-) It should be noted that "because Oracle does it that way" is a guaranteed nonstarter as a rationale for any Postgres feature proposal. There are enough differences between Postgres and Oracle that you will need to do significant investigation before assuming that an Oracle- based feature design is appropriate for Postgres. Aside from technical differences, we have fundamentally different priorities --- one of which is simplicity of administration. You'll get no buyin on proposals that tend to create Oracle-like difficulties of installation and tuning. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: