"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Seems this will have to wait for 7.3.
> Why?
Because Paul's not yet responded to my gripes of (now) 10 days ago.
The patch as given reverts the I/O behavior of the inet datatypes
to what it originally was, rather than the compromise behavior that
was hammered out at great length before 7.1. (I'd give a link to
those discussions if fts.postgresql.org were working :-()
> and, to be a bit more riendly to those of us stuck on 56k lines, could you
> avoid re-sending, repeatedly, large patch files?
I agree on that one ...
regards, tom lane