Re: Throw some low-level C scutwork at me
От | Andy Lester |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Throw some low-level C scutwork at me |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 96C8F1C2-64A5-45F3-899B-1FD3E7826AA5@petdance.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Throw some low-level C scutwork at me ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Throw some low-level C scutwork at me
Re: Throw some low-level C scutwork at me |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On May 1, 2009, at 2:37 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Regardless, I > agree with Tom that the idea of having decorators of any kind in > source > or docs is a bad idea. Why is it a bad idea? I don't understand the downside of a line or two at the bottom of a source file. > That being said, there is no reason why we can have a section of the > wiki that has .rc files for respective editors and environments that > conform to .Org coding conventions. I've always found it preferable to have the editors enforce the coding standards for us, without relying on the coder do anything on his end. I'd rather that volunteers, especially new volunteers, spend their time and brain cycles thinking about code, not messing with config files. xoa -- Andy Lester => andy@petdance.com => www.theworkinggeek.com => AIM:petdance
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: