Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9695f035-0f2b-92b9-deed-0b7e5bb7e4e0@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 24.01.23 07:57, Michael Paquier wrote: >> For the 0004 patch, it should be documented why one would want one behavior >> or the other. That's totally unclear right now. > I am not 100% sure whether we should have this part at the end, but as > an exit path in case somebody complains about the extra load with the > automated jumbling compared to the hash of the query strings, that can > be used as a backup. Anyway, attached is what would be a > clarification. Ok, the documentation make sense now. I wonder what the performance impact is. Probably, nobody cares about microoptimizing CREATE TABLE statements. But BEGIN/COMMIT could matter. However, whatever you do in between the BEGIN and COMMIT will already be jumbled, so you're already paying the overhead. Hopefully, jumbling such simple commands will have no noticeable overhead. In other words, we should test this and hopefully get rid of the 'string' method.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: