Re: Full Text Search dictionary issues
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Full Text Search dictionary issues |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 967.1279239795@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Full Text Search dictionary issues (Howard Rogers <hjr@diznix.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Full Text Search dictionary issues
Re: Full Text Search dictionary issues |
Список | pgsql-general |
Howard Rogers <hjr@diznix.com> writes: > I have 10 million rows in a table, with full text index created on one > of the columns. I submit this query: > ims=# select count(*) from search_rm > ims-# where to_tsvector('english', textsearch) > ims-# @@ to_tsquery('english', 'woman & beach & ball'); > count > ------- > 646 > (1 row) > Time: 107.570 ms > ...and those are excellent times. But if I alter the query to read: > ims=# select count(*) from search_rm > where to_tsvector('english', textsearch) > @@ to_tsquery('english', 'woman & beach & ftx1'); > count > ------- > 38343 > (1 row) > Time: 640.985 ms > ...then, as you see, it slows the query down by a factor of about 6, ... um, but it increased the number of matching rows by a factor of almost 60. I think your complaint of poor scaling is misplaced. > which is not so good! The problem is that we need to be able to search > for "ftx1", since that's a flag we put in our document records to tell > us the file type, and we need to be able to retrieve different file > types at different times. You might want to rethink how you're doing that --- it seems like a file type flag ought to be a separate column rather than a word in a text field. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: