Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9666.1506446327@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
I wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> OK, that seems to be the consensus. So let's apply the blacklist patch >> and then separately remove the 'created in the same transaction' test. >> We'll need to adjust the regression tests and docs accordingly. > Agreed. I'll work on that in a little bit. Pushed; sorry for the delay. I noticed that the blacklist mechanism effectively removed the prohibition against using a renamed enum value later in the same transaction, so I added a regression test for that. Also, as committed, I used RENAME TYPE rather than ALTER OWNER in the test cases requiring an updated pg_type row. That way we don't need to create a role, even a transient one, which is a good thing in terms of not risking collisions with other sessions. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: