Re: 9.6 -> 10.0

El 18/05/16 a las 01:35, Darren Duncan escribió:
> Following up...
>
> It appears from today's PgCon meeting that the majority of core
> developers agree with my simplified proposal, just having MAJOR.PATCH
> version numbers, and that the plan is to implement that, pending
> packager/etc feedback.
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2016_Developer_Meeting#Poll_on_Version_Numbering

Looking at possible issues regarding packaging and new versioning format
last weekend, I couldn't find any reason for the versioning change to
break packaging on PGDG debs and rpms.

Anyway, lets wait on the actual packagers to state their points of view. ;)

Regards,

--
Martín Marqués                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services