Re: memory leak in trigger handling (since PG12)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: memory leak in trigger handling (since PG12) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 965727.1684862910@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: memory leak in trigger handling (since PG12) (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: memory leak in trigger handling (since PG12)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > I've wondered about some form of instrumentation to detect such issues > before. Yeah. > Could it help to have a mode where the executor shutdown hook checks how much > memory is allocated in ExecutorState and warns if its too much? It'd be very hard to set a limit for what's "too much", since the amount of stuff created initially will depend on the plan size. In any case I think that the important issue is not how much absolute space, but is there per-row leakage. I wonder if we could do something involving checking for continued growth after the first retrieved tuple, or something like that. > Random aside: I've been wondering whether it'd be worth introducing an > in-place representation of Bitmap (e.g. if the low bit is set, the low 63 bits > are in-place, if unset, it's a pointer). Why? Unlike Lists, those things are already a single palloc chunk. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: