Re: tsearch_core for inclusion
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tsearch_core for inclusion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 964.1174018305@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: tsearch_core for inclusion ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Surely the CREATE INDEX syntax has got enough warts on it already. > Do you mean something like: > CREATE INDEX ftil ON t1 USING GIST|GIN(C1 FULLTEXT); > Where FULLTEXT is like VARCHAR OPS? Yeah, that one. It might be more consistent to spell it as "fulltext_ops" but I wouldn't insist on it. Of course the issue not addressed here is where you specify all the secondary configuration data (the stuff currently handled by config tables in the contrib implementation). Perhaps the WITH clause would work for that, though in the current code WITH is targeted at the index AM not individual opclasses. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: