Re: Multi master use case?
От | Oliver Kohll - Mailing Lists |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Multi master use case? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9612B2A3-CC33-403B-84E4-956EC251C30F@gtwm.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Multi master use case? (Oliver Kohll <oliver.lists@gtwm.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 28 Jan 2012, at 15:27, "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com> wrote:
Is this a case for multi master do you think?I.e. running one on the internet, one locally.
Yes, could be.b) changing schemas (new tables, fields, views etc.) as well as data
That's a tall order; I don't think anything will do that automatically,
although rubyrep claims to at least pick up new tables.
OK, I guess I could treat one as 'schema master' and pg_dump schema + data across to the other once a night, once all activity has stopped and standard replication completed.
Any experiences/thoughts?
My experience is with Bucardo, which should do the job admirably
(but with the data only). My advice would be to just set up a test
system and try rubyrep and Bucardo out. For the latter, use the
latest Bucardo5 beta, as Bucardo4 will be deprecated soon:
http://bucardo.org/downloads/Bucardo-4.99.3.tar.gz
Oliver
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: