Re: OIDS (Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: OIDS (Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9602.949037171@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: OIDS (Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns) (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: >>>> At least the wire protocol supports it and also libpq used to support it, >>>> until at about time of postgres95/postgreSQL it was removed from libpq as >>>> "unneeded" (by Bruce IIRC). >> >> Bruce, you scoundrel! :-) >> >>>> until that time it should have theoretically been possible to >>>> return tuples of several types and sizes, either by using "select * >>>> from base* " or unions or functions in backend. > I have no idea what this was. I could have removed it, but I don't > remember anything about this. Actually I might be the guilty party. I recall having seen that libpq was willing to accept multiple T (tuple descriptor) messages interspersed in the data returned by a query. But the API that libpq presents to the application cannot support this, and I concluded after digging around in the backend that the backend couldn't do it either. I think I broke libpq's support for it during the rewrite for 6.4. This is something that might have worked once upon a time, long ago and far away. But making it work again will take considerably more than just patching libpq... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: