Re: WAL usage calculation patch
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WAL usage calculation patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 96013912-6742-be14-dca4-6e8394cc0541@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WAL usage calculation patch (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WAL usage calculation patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-04-14 05:57, Amit Kapila wrote: > Peter E, others, any suggestions on how to move forward? I think here > we should follow the rule "follow the style of nearby code" which in > this case would be to have one space after each field as we would like > it to be closer to the "Buffers" format. It would be good if we have > a unified format among all Explain stuff but we might not want to > change the existing things and even if we want to do that it might be > a broader/bigger change and we should do that as a PG14 change. What > do you think? If looks like shortening to fpw= and using one space is the easiest way to solve this issue. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: