Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions

On 06/12/2018 11:09 AM, Geoff Winkless wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 at 15:44, Christian Ullrich <chris@chrullrich.net> wrote:
>>> I did wonder about "NO CHECK" but wasn't sure if having two words
>>> would make the parser change more complex.
>> DEFERRED?
> That's a good shout. I wouldn't mind either of those choices.
>
> So can I assume at least that no-one has an objection to the general principle?
>
> I don't currently have a PG dev environment set up so it's non-trivial
> for me to implement, which I'm ok with but not if I'm just wasting my
> (and everyone else's) time :)
>



I would wait a little while. The idea's only been floated for a few hours.

cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services