Re: http://www.postgresql.org/doxlist.html (fwd)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: http://www.postgresql.org/doxlist.html (fwd) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9511.957593790@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | http://www.postgresql.org/doxlist.html (fwd) (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: http://www.postgresql.org/doxlist.html (fwd)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I was browsing your compatibility listing and had a possibly odd > question. I have Yellow Dog Linux installed on a Power Macintosh and > wondered if PostgreSQL would work? Would it be as simple as a recompile > on my platform, or would it be more complicated? Since we list PPC mklinux and LinuxPPC as tested platforms, I don't see any reason to think it wouldn't work. You might have to do a little fooling around to cobble together a suitable OS configuration template file, but I'd surely think it couldn't vary too much from the linux_ppc template. Give it a try and let us know. We always like adding new platforms to the support list ;-) BTW, hackers: does anyone understand just how the spinlock support works on PPC, SPARC, etc? For example, I see that include/port/linux.h defines HAS_TEST_AND_SET for __powerpc__ or __sparc__, but that should mean that there's a machine-specific tas() subroutine somewhere. All I can find is code in backend/storage/buffer/s_lock.c that looks like the right thing, but it's called tas_dummy() not tas()! How does control get to it? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: