Re: limiting hint bit I/O
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: limiting hint bit I/O |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9459.1295032176@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: limiting hint bit I/O (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: limiting hint bit I/O
Re: limiting hint bit I/O |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Um, yeah, I think you're having a problem keeping all the ideas straight >> ;-). �The argument about forensics has to do with how soon we're willing >> to freeze tuples, ie replace the XID with a constant. �Not about hint >> bits. > Those things are related, though. Freezing sooner could be viewed as > an alternative to hint bits. Freezing sooner isn't likely to reduce I/O compared to hint bits. What that does is create I/O that you *have* to execute ... both in the pages themselves, and in WAL. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: