Re: Proposed WAL changes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Proposed WAL changes
Дата
Msg-id 9448.983979377@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Proposed WAL changes  (Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: Proposed WAL changes
Список pgsql-hackers
Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> Do I have to send SIGHUP after changing postgresql.conf ?

In general, yes.  I think that for the (still vaporware) archdir option,
you might not need to: archdir will only be looked at by the checkpoint
subprocess, and I think that a newly spawned backend will reread
postgresql.conf anyway.  Peter, is that correct?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: