Re: Frontend error logging style
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Frontend error logging style |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 941719.1645587865@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Frontend error logging style (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Frontend error logging style
Re: Frontend error logging style |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > What about adding a pg_fatal() that's pg_log_fatal() + exit()? That keeps > pg_log_* stuff "log only", but adds something adjacent enough to hopefully > reduce future misunderstandings? I'd be okay with that, except that pg_upgrade already has a pg_fatal (because it has its *own* logging system, just in case you thought this wasn't enough of a mess yet). I'm in favor of aligning pg_upgrade's logging with the rest, but I'd hoped to leave that for later. Making the names collide would be bad even as a short-term thing, I fear. Looks like libpq_pipeline.c has its own pg_fatal, too. I'm not against choosing some name other than pg_log_fatal, but that particular suggestion has got conflicts. Got any other ideas? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: