Re: ts_tovector() to_query()
От | Severn, Chris |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ts_tovector() to_query() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 93EDA2D7FDE4774AB8258B97B8599D3802DB3C2B@gold.intra.chernay.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ts_tovector() to_query() (hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Because the query is what the user is typing in. I don't know what words the user is going to search for. if they simplysearch for 'Robocop' that would work. But how do I handle the search if they type in more than one word and still returnhalf way accurate results? I suppose after talking through it a bit, this may be more of a ranking issue than an actual query issue. I will read upmore on ranking in the postgres docs. I skimmed past it since it didn't seem to apply, but now looking over it again, Ithink it could help. Thanks. Chris -----Original Message----- From: depesz@depesz.com [mailto:depesz@depesz.com] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 7:59 AM To: Severn, Chris Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] ts_tovector() to_query() On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:50:50PM +0000, Severn, Chris wrote: > What I want to do is return items that have 'Robocop' or 'Robocop and > DVD' or 'Robocop and Collection' or 'Robocop and DVD and collection' Based on the criteria above, I would say that: SELECT m.* FROM movies m WHERE to_tsvector(m.item_title) @@ to_tsquery('Robocop') will do what you need, since "dvd" and "collection" are irrelevant for the results. Best regards, depesz -- The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it. http://depesz.com/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: