RE: [INTERFACES] Re: Read-only in MSAccess
От | Michael Davis |
---|---|
Тема | RE: [INTERFACES] Re: Read-only in MSAccess |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 93C04F1F5173D211A27900105AA8FCFC145259@lambic.prevuenet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
I did some brief testing with Access97, the log files did not show any references to "primary" nor "foreign". I would to know if it is possible to get Access to ask the server what the primary keys are? I know there is an ODBC function call that an application can use to see what functionality the driver supports. I wonder how this called is being handled in the postgres ODBC driver? I am sure I will be doing a lot more testing on this in the near future. -----Original Message----- From: Ross J. Reedstrom [SMTP:reedstrm@rice.edu] Sent: Monday, March 08, 1999 3:05 PM To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: Read-only in MSAccess I've noticed this affect. Has anyone run traces of the connection, to see if Access tries to determine the primary key from the backend? Does this requirement go away if you (manually) set the 'relhaspkey' bool in pg_class for the table? I'd do all this testing myself, but my NT test box got taken away (yeay! boo! I'm so conflicted...) Ross Ben Gunter wrote: > > (Original message was lost. Oops.) > > I was fiddling around with Access and the ODBC driver this morning and > discovered that Access will not allow you update ODBC sources unless you pick > at least one field (up to ten) as a unique index. Otherwise, it's read-only. > > Hope this helps. > > -Ben -- Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm@rice.edu> NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer Computer and Information Technology Institute Rice University, 6100 S. Main St., Houston, TX 77005
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: