Re: Are WALs affected by 'duplicate key' errors?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Are WALs affected by 'duplicate key' errors? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9386.1005940291@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Are WALs affected by 'duplicate key' errors? ("Jeff Boes" <jboes@nexcerpt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
"Jeff Boes" <jboes@nexcerpt.com> writes: > We have an application that attempts many insertions into a table, > detecting the prior existance of the row by whether we get a 'duplicate > key in unique index' error. When this application is running as multiple > copies and really cranking, we get 130K or more of these in a day. Are > these filling up (and possibly messing up) our WALs? Shouldn't be a problem. > We have experienced a few shared-memory corruption errors, and a > full-blown corruption (although of a different table). The last couple of reports we got like that turned out to be hardware problems (bad RAM, flaky disk controller, that sort of thing). It wouldn't be a waste of time to run some hardware diagnostics. I have been thinking about your report of trouble with the 7.1.2 to 7.1.3 upgrade, and I have to confess bafflement. There shouldn't be any compatibility issue there AFAICS. Are you sure there wasn't anything else that changed at the same time? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: