Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e11001080833p7fe58a54ub4e1c81f18b31b5a@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network
Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 15:12 +0000, Dave Page wrote: >> Hey Andrew >> >> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: >> > >> > Windows came late to the buildfarm. According to the CVS log, the buildfarm >> > client was first checked in in Sept 2004, got initial Mingw support in Jan >> > 2005 and MSVC support in March 2007, when we finally got some of the tools >> > sorted out. >> >> Right - but the buildfarm isn't a feature being offered to end users. >> > > Neither is this. These people are developers or DBAs after all. I know I'm a little slower than normal this week as I've had some sort of virus, but say what? I was kinda under the impression that developers/DBAs are end users of PostgreSQL. They make up a significant percentage of people that I know than install, configure and use it. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: