Re: Application name patch - v4

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> If people are agreed that double connect is a better alternative

I still kinda like 'SET DEFAULT', but I'm far from wed to it. A double
connect certainly seems like it would be better than the
inconsistency.

> I'm willing to go look at how to make it happen.

That's good, 'cos I'm sure it'll end up being a whole lot less ugly
than if I did it :-)

-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com