Re: Experimental patch: generating BKI revisited
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Experimental patch: generating BKI revisited |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10911130800t61f335c5x1742d0f082bd1781@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Experimental patch: generating BKI revisited (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Experimental patch: generating BKI revisited
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> I had a look at this some time ago and I must admit that I find it >> pretty interesting. The technology choices make it >> obviously impossible to merge -- not only the particular Perl modules >> used, but the mere fact that Perl is used (and that such a recent >> version is required). But you're already aware of all this so I'm not >> going to say more. > > Really? Perl is a show-stopper? That seems harsh. Perl is pretty > ubiquitous - in fact, given that we now support Windows, arguably more > so than awk. Building in VC++ on Windows already requires Perl. And if you're building in mingw, you've probably already got it, or can get it pretty easily. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: