Re: next CommitFest
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: next CommitFest |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10911130033n41601842u54d77fa08c3ad17a@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: next CommitFest (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: next CommitFest
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:15 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> Personally, I would not propose to impose this rule of first-time >> contributors, or even second-time contributors. But by about patch #3 >> I think everyone should be pitching in. > > I hate to ask, but how would we enforce this? Do we no longer apply > patches for 3rd-time submitters who have not reviewed? That seems to be > hurting us more than them. Are we prepared to discard valid patches > for this reason? What about people who contribute hours and hours of their time in other ways? Are they required to contribute even more of their time to review as well, just to help their own occasional code contributions get through the process? (yes, I am thinking largely of me, working tens of hours per week on Postgres, but perhaps submiting one relatively small patch per release) -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: