Re: Client application name

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes:
>> This might be a good argument for changing that going forward, but
>> it will be *years* before we can rely on it for anything.
>
> That's what I meant by 'a few releases' (major, not minor).

BTW, any thoughts on Heikki's suggestions of hacking about the
'options' value or retrying the connection vs. just doing a SET
post-connection in libpq? It's pretty certain that whatever I choose
you probably won't like :-p

-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PGDay.EU 2009 Conference: http://2009.pgday.eu/start