Re: Client application name

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> ISTM much of the complexity discussed relates to this second feature.
> Let's just concentrate on getting the connection-pool-identification
> aspect of this done right and then maybe add second part later.

That side of the patch works fine already (it's only a GUC after all),
as does the during-connection option. The current problem is that old
servers will barf if it's set in the startup packet.

And yes, the stats part also works :-).

-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PGDay.EU 2009 Conference: http://2009.pgday.eu/start