Re: Application name patch - v2
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Application name patch - v2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10910190500p3bb31030t849656a9c00fe76@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Application name patch - v2 (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Application name patch - v2
Re: Application name patch - v2 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > It is not practical. I'll log errors. Usually SQL injection generates > lot of errors. Loging all statements has not sense. What is difference > bad and good SQL statement.? Maybe multistatements are good candidates > for log as possible attackers statements. On highly load databases > loging all statements significantly increase load :( Ahh, I see. >> My point is, that the query to change the app name is logged using the >> *original* app name, thus it will not be discarded by the log analysis >> tools in your scenario. >> > > I thing, so change of original name should generate warning. Well, if other people think that's necessary, it's certainly possible. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: