Re: Client application name

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Jaime Casanova
<jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>>
>> Oh, and apologies to Jaime who I just noticed had volunteered to work
>> on this :-(
>>
>
> never mind... i get blocked for the ugliness of the libpq api connect
> functions...
> and my first attempt to solve that was seriously broken...

Funny - I reverted my first attempt at that bit too.

> besides, as Robert mention, because of pooler connections using a GUC
> is more appropiate...

I'd like both options to be available to the programmer.



-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:   http://www.enterprisedb.com