Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10908100745r1c1aa777y684311cc97495223@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on
Windows
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Magnus Hagander<magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 16:10, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >>> It's been a couple of weeks now, and I've had a number of reports both >>> on-list, on-blog and in private, from people using this. I have not >>> yet had a single report of a problem caused by this patch (not >>> counting the case where there was a version mismatch - can't fault the >>> patch for that). >> >>> Given that, I say we apply this for 8.3 and 8.4 now. Comments? >> >> 8.2 as well, no? > > 8.2 has a different shmem implementation - the one that emulates sysv > shmem. The patch will need to be changed around for that, and I > haven't looked at that. It may be worthwhile to do that, but it's a > separate patch, so let's get it out in 8.3 and 8.4 first. Has anyone reported the problem on 8.2? -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: