Re: Second l10n patch
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Second l10n patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10908030404q2e67e375ycc9ad3415e440ebf@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Second l10n patch (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: Second l10n patch
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
2009/8/3 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>: > Le lundi 3 août 2009 à 12:33:56, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit : >> Le lundi 3 août 2009 à 11:57:02, Dave Page a écrit : >> > 2009/8/1 Marek Černocký <marek@manet.cz>: >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > I send patch. It solves translation for object type names in reports. >> > >> > Should code like this use wxPLURAL? >> > >> > int section = report->XmlCreateSection(wxString::Format(_("%s >> > dependents"), object->GetTranslatedTypeName().c_str())); >> >> No. We need wxPLURAL when we have a variable that tells us if it is plural >> or not. In this code, there's nothing that gives us a hint about it. >> >> Note that I didn't actually try this patch. Only read it. > > Just tried it, and it works the way I think it should. I can commit it if you > want. Sure - thanks. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: