Re: Vote on Windows installer links
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vote on Windows installer links |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10907081238y7c26e600w4c872b08b9f0b724@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Vote on Windows installer links (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Alvaro Herrera<alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > Dave Page wrote: > >> You keep talking about our installer, but as I've pointed out, most of >> the packages linked to from postgresql.org come from third party >> websites, some of which are also commercial. >> >> I assume your desire is for *all* of those off-site links to be >> removed, and that you aren't singling out EnterpriseDB? > > The only one I can see that is not the operating system vendor's own > site is Devrim's pgsqlrpms.org, which I knew was a bad idea when I first > saw it. And now I realize that it even redirects to a commandprompt.com > site, which is even worse :-( Vendor or not, they're still third party. The Ubuntu site for example, has links to their store, and Canonical's support services. If this isn't a case of Simon being vindictive towards his ex-employer (which I would like to think it is not), surely this survey should address all of those third party site equally, and not single out EnterpriseDB? -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: