Re: Vacuum on the database versus individual tables.
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vacuum on the database versus individual tables. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10906250859y698ffc14y9ef7cf88d85afd4b@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Vacuum on the database versus individual tables. (Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Vacuum on the database versus individual tables.
Re: Vacuum on the database versus individual tables. |
Список | pgsql-general |
2009/6/25 Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>: > 2009/6/25 Hartman, Matthew <Matthew.Hartman@krcc.on.ca>: >> Windows XP, PostgreSQL 8.3.5, using pgAdmin III 1.8.4. It's the typical "Running vacuum on this table is recommended"dialog box. > > Well, it really has nothing to do with postgresql it self. Either it > is a bug or property of PgAdmin, but I don't know. > Either someone who knows more about pgadmin is going to respond here, > or you have to ask on pgadmin list. pgAdmin will advise vacuuming a table if there is a significant discrepancy between the number of rows in the table and the value in pg_class.reltuples. i forget the exact algorithm off-hand, but it takes the size of the table into account, and is looking for a %age difference between the value, not a set number of rows. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: