Re: [BUGS] Integrity check
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] Integrity check |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10906230630o5fbea56braaa674015e6241f2@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] Integrity check (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] Integrity check
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:26 PM, David Fetter<david@fetter.org> wrote: >> Auditors can be a funny breed. > > They can, at that, but in this case, they're simply doing the normal > human thing of trying to figure out whether there's a way they can > push off their work to someone or something else. In this case, they > can't. Depends what they've been hired to audit exactly - there's a difference in the way they will attack the IT aspects of a financial audit versus an IT management audit for example. In my experience, the former is worse because they are often done by finance people who will simply box-tick 'verified backups' before reporting to the board or regulator, unlike an IT auditor who will look at the systems as a whole and judge the processes based on their technical merit. Anyway - this is pre-beer conference talk... -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: