Re: Archives policy
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Archives policy |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10904160827r19c50f2fg79a552fdaae96836@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Archives policy (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Archives policy
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Dave Page wrote: > >> OK, well I've removed the bit about removing illegal/unwanted >> material. FWIW, we *will* remove such unwanted content, otherwise we >> could easily become an online archive for pr0n/warez etc. which will >> certainly not do our reputation any good. > > Now that you've hashed that out, would you explain *how* would you > actually remove the posts? It requires editing the majordomo archive > store, but I don't think many people has access to that ... I know I > don't for one (and I keep wondering why, seeing how I am the de facto > archives maintainer). Yeah, thanks for raising that! If we catch inappropriate messages almost immediately, it should just be a case of stopping mhonarc from running and deleting the messages from the mbox file. If they've been there are while (and renumbering messages will be a problem), then we'll need to hack the file to blank out the undesirable message body I guess. That's the bit I describe as 'error prone' :-) Regarding access, I guess you never needed access in the past (or people like me were just being too dense to realise you did) so it never got raised. I have no objection FWIW. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: