Re: Archives policy
| От | Dave Page |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Archives policy |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 937d27e10904160705y3f59662r3161d9bcd0add30b@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Archives policy (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Archives policy
|
| Список | pgsql-www |
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes: >> Can I get comments/objections/opinions on this draft policy please? >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Archives_Policy > > Hmm, the first section suggests that there are cases where we will > de-archive messages, and then the second lays out all the reasons > why we won't and why it's useless to ask. So I'm still confused > what the policy is. I would be happy with a policy that says > "The archives are graven on stone tablets. Don't bother asking." > but if we are willing to editorialize in extreme cases then maybe > the second part needs to be modified. I don't think we can refuse if there is anything illegal, defamatory, extremist, pornographic etc. It's everything else that should be set in stone though I think. I've since found similar policies on other sites (thanks Stefan) which might useful to look at/borrow. The W3C's for example seems pretty good: http://www.w3.org/Mail/ArchiveEditingPolicy -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: