Re: the patch: support for DESC/NULLS FIRST/NULLS LAST
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: the patch: support for DESC/NULLS FIRST/NULLS LAST |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10811170103m2ea5f6eu8d07df867fe5c8ce@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: the patch: support for DESC/NULLS FIRST/NULLS LAST (Quan Zongliang <quanzongliang@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: the patch: support for DESC/NULLS FIRST/NULLS LAST
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Quan Zongliang <quanzongliang@gmail.com> wrote: >> First, I don't like the group of radio buttons. I think it would be >> better to replace it with a combo box. I actually think the radio buttons are most appropriate. We normally use a combo box for situations where the values may change in content or quantity which is not the case here. We already do this on the parameters tab of dlgFunction (though the buttons aren't in a panel on there, and the index dialog should remain consistent with that). Other minor issues: The case of the text should follow existing cases as well - if a label is exactly what would be used in an SQL statement, then it's in upper case, otherwise, mixed. EG. DESC, FIRST and LAST, with NULLs and Default. The DESC checkbox doesn't align horizontally with the combo box to its left. The columns list view doesn't size correctly when the form is opened on Mac. This may be because Guillaume's latest sizing fixes haven't been committed yet, or they may need to be extended to cover this dialog. >> Second, the grid should have three columns: Column Name, Order, and >> NULLs Order. > > All done. > > Modify mode have one column, new mode have three columns. It's ok? They should be the same for consistency. One day we may be able to add a column to an index. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: