Re: Performance Question
| От | Dave Page |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Performance Question |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 937d27e10811130055n5dc00b63uaf1fce9096117a9e@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Performance Question (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > - - <themanatuf@yahoo.com> writes: >> One of my tables has 660,000 records and doing a SELECT * from that table (without any joins or sorts) takes 72 seconds.Ordering the table based on 3 columns almost doubles that time to an average of 123 seconds. To me, those numbersare crazy slow and I don't understand why the queries are taking so long. The tables are UTF-8 encode and containa mix of languages (English, Spanish, etc). I'm running the query from pgadmin3 on a remote host. The server has nothingelse running on it except the database. > > pgadmin has got its own performance issues with large select results. They were fixed a couple of years ago. We're essentially at the mercy of libpq now. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: