Re: Finding some bug statistics..
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Finding some bug statistics.. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10809300816o44022bb5p7de74dee5a08e52a@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Finding some bug statistics.. (Chander Ganesan <chander@otg-nc.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Finding some bug statistics..
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Chander Ganesan <chander@otg-nc.com> wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >> We don't have a bug tracker, thus there is nothing to gather statistics >> from. We have a web form that is really just a sequence in a database >> that generates a bug id, and then remails the whole form to pgsql-bugs. >> >> For discussions of why we don't have one, see about a billion mails in >> the archives over the past 10 years or so :-( >> > > The general policy is a 72 hour bug fix, right? There is no general policy that I'm aware of. > Do we have any > ideas/numbers as to the currently "open" number of bugs (identified but not > fixed yet)? That would be just as useful in some regard. Nope. > Also, is the sequence only a sequence, or is some of the data held in the > database (queryable?) At the very least, I could probably get an idea of > the bug submit rate by looking at the first bug of each month in the bugs > archive (or are many of the "bugs" really SPAM)? It's literally just a sequence. And the messages do get moderated, so some numbers will be lost as spam. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: