Re: Hot Standby Design
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hot Standby Design |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10809240028q1bb93f87w8202f8edd7885e3d@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hot Standby Design (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hot Standby Design
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > I presume this means the backend kill function would work? Also, can you go > into why pgAgent would not work? (I presume it's because you can't update > information that needs to be changed when jobs run, if thats the case it > might be worth thinking about making pgAgent work across different clusters) Probably - it needs to be able to update its catalogs to record job results and ensure that only a single node runs any given job instance. We could probably update the code to optionally accept a connection string instead of a database name, which would allow us to operate against servers other than the one with the catalogs installed. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: