Re: Why are binary snapshots older than binary production release versions?
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why are binary snapshots older than binary production release versions? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10809070350g778b6395m14442ab363add18d@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Why are binary snapshots older than binary production release versions? ("Obe, Regina" <robe.dnd@cityofboston.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why are binary snapshots older than binary
production release versions?
|
Список | pgadmin-support |
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Obe, Regina <robe.dnd@cityofboston.gov> wrote: > There used to be a time when the binary snapshots on the pgadmin site were > the latest and greatest and newer than the latest production build. Now it > seems only the binary snapshots for slackware are the latest and greatest > and things like windows date back to 2007, much older than even the > production build. > > Even the source snapshot seems to be older than the slackware binary builds. > Just wondering what happened there? The source and slackware builds are automated on developer.pgadmin.org. I've fixed the source builds which were broken by a typo in a Makefile. The OSX build was an automate build run by Florian - I don't know what happened to that. I can probably run it on a box in my office if Florian's is permanently offline. The Win32 builds were never automated, and rely on one of us to remember to build one from time to time. Which we clearly keep forgetting :-( I'll add it to my list. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления: