Re: CommitFest rules
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CommitFest rules |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10807031516s1303ceaeq87553ee1d7ba205f@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CommitFest rules (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: CommitFest rules
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes: >> Are you suggesting that omission of a patch on the 'fest' page means >> that you are bumped from the fest? > > No, if you had submitted the patch on time then the correct next step > is to get it added to the fest page; I don't think that should be > controversial. But the reviewers aren't gonna review it if it's not > listed on that page... Right, but the author should take some responsibility for ensuring the patch is listed on time. What we don't want is forgotten patches getting added at the last minute, right as the CommitFest manager is wrapping things up having got 95% of the patches reviewed and the other 5% in progress. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: