Re: stat() vs cygwin
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: stat() vs cygwin |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10806240147v7e0c9f4fje8ca0a29b3a12646@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: stat() vs cygwin (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: stat() vs cygwin
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > Yes. > > As in the cygwin build does build. Nobody really has verified if the fix > is needed there. But frankly, if you are likely to care about the > effects of this issue, you won't be running cygwin anyway. It's mostly a > dead platform for postgresql anyway, AFAICS we only keep it building for > legacy compatibility. Once it starts taking lots of resources to keep > building (which it doesn't now), I think we should just drop it instead... FWIW, the most recent packages from Cygwin themselves are 8.2.5. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: