Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10805270618u5424d9e0ta1ab092ca348eb3d@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules (Justin Clift <justin@salasaga.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules
Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules |
Список | pgsql-general |
HI Justin On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Justin Clift <justin@salasaga.org> wrote: > I'm trying to point out that - PG is a database system - and MS may have > just been granted a patent for a fundamental part of it. > > Thinking it might need looking in to, and trying to bring it to the > attention of some that can (or even cares?). ;> I don't think it's a major issue. Even if MS do think we infringe on the patent it would be laughable for them to try to do anything about it given that our rules implementation has provably existed in a leading FOSS project for a decade or more. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: