Re: License question
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: License question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10804250116q4e62b993o824b0bb30af766f0@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | License question ("Mickael Deloison" <mdeloison@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: License question
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Mickael Deloison <mdeloison@gmail.com> wrote: > From > what I understand I have nothing to do since my code would be under > the Artistic License and freely available. Correct? Yes, in that respect you can comply with the Artistic licence in the same way as GPL - use the same (Artistic) licence and release the source code. If you are able to separate your code from the pgAdmin code however, it may make sense to dual licence the pgScript engine - have it under Artistic for bundling in pgAdmin, and BSD for possible future integration with psql. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: