Re: postgresql.org mail infrastructure

On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>  Hash: SHA1
>
>
>  On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:39:34 -0300
>  Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>
>  > +1 to the project -- assuming that it means a change of infrastructure
>  > and not necessarily of tools.  I, for one, would oppose changing Mj2
>  > for Mailman, for instance.  (However, whether we use Sendmail or
>  > Postfix or something else entirely I don't care ...)
>
>  Actually this is a good point. We really should define requirements as
>  part of this, let's not just do it wholesale. Here are a couple:
>
>   * Software must be open source?
>   * Environment must be managed by the community
>   * Attempt to have admins in each of the following timezones
>    EST
>    PST
>    CET
>    * I believe with those three we have 24x7 coverage
>   * FreeBSD is OS?

Please stick to the point of this thread.

-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk