Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 937d27e10803201526n5c8c0901icbae3729765e36e@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > Dave Page wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > > I saw your request for documentation on the infrastructure but I don't > > > remember anything else. I don't se this as a core discussion because > > > the team is going to be more than core folks. > > > > I've suggested a number of times that we need to decouple all > > postgresql.org mail infrastructure from hub.org so it can be > > independently managed. Numerous people have been asked the same thing > > here for much longer, but have given up because the answer has always > > been no. Thats why I've been raising it in core. > > OK, so maybe there is the crux. Who says "no" unchallenged? I don't > think I can, and I don't think anyone else in this community can either. I think you can guess who says no (if not, I'll tell you out of band). I seem to be the only person doing any challenging and without some nods of agreement at least I cannot do much more. We do at least have some more documentation as of yesterday though... but the current problems are with a whole server which that doesn't help with. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: